How is a UFO arranged? UFO internals Other inventions by Schauberger.

According to eyewitnesses who have been on board a UFO, inside the spacecraft you can see a flat matte surface devoid of various technical units familiar to terrestrial aircraft or spaceships. This circumstance indicates the possible internal arrangement of the units, as if recessed into the panel of the interior. Here we see a logic that is not familiar to us. Extraterrestrial intelligence is trying to free the internal space of the ship from all that is superfluous. The same rule applies to controls. The only thing that in most cases remains familiar to an earthling is the seats of the crew members of a flying saucer. However, the control systems are minimized as much as possible and are very poor in appearance in comparison with their terrestrial counterparts. For example, many contactees who have been on board a UFO testify to the most modest technical decoration of the ship.

“There were no objects, only ingenious devices and something that looked like a small cloth, all with stars and dots, each of which pulsated in its own way ...” (from the description of Alberto Gordoni; Sicily, Italy; May 3, 1753)
“Looking into one of the windows of the cone-like ship, I saw a wonderful picture. Five rectangles glowed like TV screens. One of them was very large - I have never seen such in my life! In front of the screen in an empty room, a woman with a golden scythe looked at some images - drawings ... ”(from the description of Magda, a resident of the town of Kranj, Slovenia, Yugoslavia; 1965).

“The strange matte-colored object was the size of a car, 2.5 meters high, shaped like a rugby ball (ellipsoidal UFO). On the side is a sliding door. Nearby were two creatures about a meter tall, they had large ears and a hole instead of a mouth. The lower part of the apparatus was 50 centimeters from the ground, it rested on a cylindrical pipe. The upper part of the apparatus consisted of a transparent dome (lantern), so it was clear that there was nothing inside that could attract attention. Both strangers went inside, the door slid down, and those who entered did not make any action or gesture for this. They were perfectly visible through the dome. Then a dull noise was heard, the apparatus rose about half a meter, the pipe came out of the ground, and the four legs began to rotate clockwise. The device flew down the slope at a very high speed and disappeared after 50 meters. For about a quarter of an hour, the eyewitness could not move ... ”(from the description of the peasant Maurice Massa; who witnessed the landing of a UFO in a vineyard near the village of Valensole, southern France; July 1, 1965).

“The egg-shaped object, 5 x 2.5 m, glowed with blue light and made a buzzing sound. At the end of the object, a door opened, and three strange creatures with heads without necks and hands that looked like paws with pincers seemed to “float” out of it. There were no seats or equipment inside the facility, but it was very light. Hickson "floated" there in a state of weightlessness. The aliens gave him a horizontal position, after which some unusual apparatus the size of a basketball, similar to an eye, moved out of the wall, hovered and then moved back and forth over Hickson. (from a description by Hickson and Parker; Pascagoula, Mississippi, USA; October 1973).

This is just not a complete list of testimonies of people who have been on board alien spacecraft. However, judging from these and many other descriptions, it follows that control systems are minimized as much as possible. Many elements of the avionics familiar to us could not be seen by people in view of the fact that they are simply a virtual visualization. Before the 21st century, such evidence looked very naive. However, today the meager technical equipment of UFOs is becoming clear to mankind. In the same way, the absence and maximum minimization of buttons on a smartphone might seem strange just twenty years ago! Elements such as an automatic airlock door that obeys sensors tuned to movement seemed like a fantasy some 20-30 years ago. What can we say about such things as liquid crystals, 3D image, and touch sensors. From the descriptions it follows that the UFO uses all the technologies that humanity has discovered only recently. Many technologies remain incomprehensible even to this day.

All descriptions feature a smooth, even surface (like metal) of the interior of the ship, a smooth, soft diffused light coming either from the ceiling or coming from all sides at the same time. Another interesting feature is the absence of sharp (sharp) corners delimiting the walls, floor and ceiling. In most cases, the descriptions feature their absence and, as it were, the “beveling” of the inner corners. The ceiling of the interior of the UFO is a dome or a domed shape. Completely, the interior spaces are something like an oval without the clear internal corners we are used to. This was probably done to adapt to weightlessness conditions. Oval (concave) internal walls make it possible to more effectively dampen the kinetic energy of a collision of a body floating in weightlessness. Thus, one can see a very practical rational decision of the designers. The presence of sharp corners, smooth walls, as well as a pile of various equipment increases the injury rate and simply makes it difficult to move on board the ship.

Also from the descriptions of the interior of the UFO follows the presence of an oval annular corridor encircling the interior. From this we can make an indirect conclusion about the entire structure of the ship similar to a bee hive. Another comparison is with a matryoshka, where all the ship's rooms seem to be nested into each other and are completely symmetrical with respect to the external parameters of the ship. Indirectly, this is indicated by the very symmetry of the flying saucers. As a rule, the command room (cabin) is located in the upper part of the ship and is a hall closed from above by a dome of a lantern similar to the lantern of military terrestrial aircraft. The lantern can become both transparent, smoky, and mirror-tinted. In all likelihood, either it is made of some kind of composite alloy or is organic glass with a Faraday grid inserted inside (similar to the one found on microwave ovens). On the opposite side of the cabin, in the lower part of the ship, there is a cargo lock. In the central part of the ship is the power plant, which is the heart of the ship. Apparently, the construction of a flying saucer begins with the reactor. First, a reactor is created, around which the interior is gradually built up. All construction is completed with the installation of a disc-shaped wing and an outer hull. Such a construction of a flying saucer again resembles the construction of a beehive from the center and the gradual build-up of walls to the periphery.

The complete absence of doors and windows completes the description of eyewitnesses. From which it follows that either doors can appear anywhere in a ship made of a smart composite material capable of transforming. Or the contours of the doors are indicated by light (thermal, etc.) indicators (markers) visible in the part of the spectrum inaccessible to the human eye, but accessible to the sight of aliens. The absence of windows is fully explained by the capabilities of an extraterrestrial computer and the ability of the outer case to become transparent. Probably, the capabilities of the computer and the smart composite material of the UFO hull can explain the topology of space, when there is a clear mismatch between the dimensions of the interior and the outer size of the ship. That is, what was taken for a large room, gigantic halls and a room filled with even light without boundaries, was only a virtual projection. A virtual projection can explain the number of crew members of an interstellar ship, some of which may well be only a three-dimensional image on a panoramic "screen".

Thus, we can conclude that extraterrestrial spacecraft are an example of the use of high technologies, rational technical solutions and other (extraterrestrial) logic.

The material presented here sometimes contradicts itself. I deliberately do not remove these contradictions - let everyone try to find for himself what he likes and awakens technical thought.

In a nutshell, here is the real design of the flying saucer engine. Perhaps not quite Schauberger. It's interesting though, sometimes some ideas pop up. Different people, in different places, different times, but similar thoughts come. Either people are the same, or the laws of nature. Would you believe that I have never read or even heard of the works of Schauberger before (I mean his engine powered by the energy of the environment, and besides, it has levitating properties)? But when by chance (thanks to the Internet) I came across a description of his designs, I was simply amazed how much what I have been thinking about for a long time is similar to his ideas. Externally, the Schauberger engine looks like this:

Its internal structure is as follows (turned upside down in relation to the photographs):

So that you understand that I do not cling to someone else's glory, I will try to explain its device in the simplest language, because nowhere is it really described how it works, despite its seemingly rather extensive representation on the Internet. In some places, the opinion slips that this engine is generally a hoax and cannot work at all. But I think it's not. I'll try to explain. Undoubtedly, the main part of the engine is this strange at first glance wheel (in the figure above it is marked on the left with an incomprehensible inscription, obviously "turbine").

Despite the apparent complexity of the main part, it can be easily manufactured. A similarity scan of such a turbine is shown below and can presumably be cut out of a metal plate 250x500 mm 1-2 mm thick and bent accordingly. The alignment of the turbine will occur automatically during rotation (it is proposed to attach the turbine to the axis of the motor-generator using 3 radial springs at 120 degrees - the turbine will "self" find its center of rotation).

The turbine itself will look like a jester's crown. It is the "jester" and not the "king" - I apologize for such a non-normative term-comparison. But in my opinion, this is the most convenient way to explain that the turbine has helical blades, radially curved from the center to the periphery.

At first glance - some kind of devilry of 24 corkscrews rotating around the circumference for opening bottles. Why is this needed? Here I link to my own site for a chapter on the origin of tornadoes. Schauberger, in this design of his, created ideal conditions for the formation of a group of mini-tornadoes and the central tornado itself, which is the driving force of this design. Air at the first stage with the help of such a wheel is twisted around the axis of the electric motor. But the same air, when thrown to the periphery due to centrifugal force, passes through the corkscrews of the wheel and receives rotation along the axis of each of the 24 corkscrews. Air swirls around 2 axes of rotation at the same time. A rotation simultaneously around 2 axes this is such an amazing thing! Try to pick up a high-speed electric motor with a handwheel on the axis and rotate it around the axis of your own hand. Very interesting sensations. When turning the motor, forces are felt that act in completely different directions than you expect.

So this wheel forms 24 mini-tornadoes, which, bending around the inner surface of the upper part of the engine (looks like a copper basin in the photo below), along a very interesting trajectory (still turn the motor!) Break out onto the inner cone of the engine and move further to the outlet.

It is better to observe the process further in transverse section to understand what a tornado looks like when viewed from above. The first cut just below the "copper basin" is this cross section of a tornado. The other 2 are closer to the outlet. It was inconvenient to draw 24 balls, so I leave only 9, the principle is still the same. Moreover, this drawing somehow strangely echoes the drawing on wheat fields in England. Further, everywhere to the place and out of place, I will try to draw these wild analogies. Moreover, I saw photographs of the drawings in the margins much later than I completed all of the above. Isn't it strange: this cartoon below and the drawing on the wheat field were created absolutely independently of each other? However, even the number of minivortices coincided.

So 24(9) balls, twisted from small whirlwinds, roll inside along the wall of the circle. The walls of each ball in relation to the neighbors rotate in opposite directions. I will consider these balls as a dual medium: it seems to be a ball, since it rolls like a part of a ball bearing and the laws of mechanics apply to it, but at the same time it is air, which is subject to the laws of hydrodynamics. These balls, in any collision of a neighbor with a neighbor, have the intention to "run into" each other and thus move to the center of the structure, all at the same time (try to see this in the cartoon on the left), and at the same time, the opposite movement of the walls of the neighboring balls is according to Bernoulli's law is a rarefied medium, it turns out the balls are "attracted" to each other. As a result, all this mass of rotating air is drawn to the center, accelerates significantly (because the diameter of the structure decreases), moves lower and finally flies out through the nozzle from the bottom of the structure. The wheel with corkscrews, as it rotates, constantly feeds these mini-vortex-bearings and draws in air from outside. Schauberger claims that this process becomes self-sustaining. Indeed, a natural tornado can exist for a long time and its very existence is obviously supported only by the presence of a pressure difference between the external environment and the inner cone of the tornado. And inside the engine, just in the center, a vacuum zone is formed. This means that the surrounding air should strive there, falling on the turbine blades with "corkscrews" and being involved in a complex rotation trajectory, which could be called a "self-turning donut". That's how it seems to me the basic principles of this engine. In my opinion, such a process can really be called some kind of opposite to a conventional explosion ( explosion), since the substance does not scatter to the sides, but vice versa strive to converge to one point(to the base of the vortex). Schauberger called this process implosion.

I drew these 3 frames with spinning balls-rollers and again a strange thought came to mind. On television again there was a story about the next appearance of unusual circles in the wheat fields of England (and not only there). But if I didn’t have an animator to illustrate my ideas, I would try to describe the contraction of the vortex to a point in the first graphics editor I came across with something like this drawing. In my opinion, this drawing on a wheat field is an unambiguous illustration of the processes taking place in a tornado and calls for the following main conclusion: the rotating minivortexes that make up a tornado are attracted to each other and tend to the main center of rotation. And here minivortices are drawn. Pay attention - next to each main circle, several additional circles are carefully drawn, directly indicating that several mini-processes are depicted here, moving in a spiral towards the center. More precisely, there are 6 of them and they work exactly as shown in my cartoon a little higher. It is absolutely certain that a volumetric process is drawn here on a plane (a whirlwind - a tornado - a tornado). Who drew it and why is a separate big question. Even during the day, creating several such geometrically accurate circles is a big problem. And draw about 400 at night? It is unlikely that just a crazy person could do this. Maybe this can be understood as a kind of drawing-hint?

Let's go back to Schauberger. Witnesses to the operation of the Schauberger engine claimed that only air and water served as fuel. Maybe they were a little wrong. Most likely it was air and obviously alcohol (by the way, it looks like water). The engine in the process of operation should literally devour the surrounding air and then it's time to put fuel on it and set it on fire, further contributing to the process of vortex formation. With a large amount of oxygen, the flame of alcohol is almost invisible. So the result was a "flameless and smokeless engine" as described in some publications.

Approximately the same type of construction I came to in my conclusions and propose something remotely reminiscent of Schauberger's "windmill", the work is generally based on the same principles. I was inspired by the funnel of water pouring out of the bathroom and what happens inside the structures below follows the same laws.

The difference from the Schauberger mechanism is the absence of an external cone, along which the vortex is pulled to the center and ejected through the nozzle, as well as a simpler design of the wheel for forming a vortex (in fact, this is a conventional centrifugal pump). My simplification of Schauberger's design (the cartoon on the left) is due to the simple idea that a natural tornado does not need all such tricks (although the "corkscrew" wheel that he invented causes nothing but admiration - it spins the air flow along 2 perpendicular axes of rotation in the simplest and most effective way !). My task is to spin the flow into a small tornado as simply as possible and preferably with the complete absence of mechanical parts. This can be achieved by using not a centrifugal pump impeller for spinning, but by using something similar to the MHD engine described on the Electric motor page. The design is completely devoid of moving parts (with the exception of the vortex itself). It turned out something like the one shown on the right cartoon. Yellow color - an attempt to depict burning fuel (possibly kerosene?). Moreover, for an MHD engine, there must be conductive kerosene (perhaps salted?). Then they suggested to me that there should be a sodium additive. Roughly speaking, this is an attempt to reproduce a formidable natural phenomenon in a tin can. And even more precisely the process, the essence of which is clear from the bottom cartoon.

"Tornado in a glass" "Just a tornado"

For the first time, Einstein saw the left drawing in an ordinary glass with tea and floating tea leaves (let's call it Einstein's glass). Take a closer look: the central ascending part is the "tornado's trunk" (only in the left figure it raises tea leaves, and on the right there are houses and cars). It is strange that Einstein himself did not draw such conclusions. And Schauberger seems to have done it. Almost all the designs that are offered on this site are based on the process that takes place in this glass.

So to speak - some points for the main engine of a flying saucer. True, only for the atmosphere. And the questions of horizontal flight have not yet been considered. Can you imagine how useful a device with such an engine would be for, say, the Ministry of Emergency Situations? Remember the fire at the Ostankino television tower and the complete helplessness of a helicopter flying around? And by the way, photographs of some UFOs, even by their very appearance, make one think that they have a central engine operating on the principles of the tin can described above, and such a machine would be much more useful than an ordinary helicopter. Simply irreplaceable. Torque is compensated by the presence of several engines on the same platform. Like in the bottom photo. In my opinion, there are 3 inverted Schauberger engines (such as Repulsine B) working for one central nozzle. And it’s probably more correct to place Repulsin like this:

In the photo UFO Adamsky relies on 3 (or 4?) engines similar to Repulsine B. These engines are attached to the bottom of the "hat" and generate 3 or 4 tornadoes on which the whole structure "dangles". One large and three smaller.

Let us return again to the Schauberger engine as an energy generator. The processes occurring in the Einstein glass are undoubtedly the basis of the engine. Let's try to achieve a stable passage of the process. To do this, spin the water in the tank using a disk on the axis of the electric motor motor. Water after spinning will move along a complex trajectory. (fluid movement is described on the site www.evert.de, a computer drawing from this site is given). Very interesting conclusions can be drawn from this figure. The linear speed of water movement along this ornate path is constant and is determined by the linear speed movement of the edges of the disc. The liquid dispersed by the disk spirals down and is further pushed towards the center. At this moment there is an increase in the angular velocity of water rotation. (A vivid analogue of such an increase in the speed of rotation is the rotation of a thread with a load when winding this thread around a finger). The fluid rises with an increased angular velocity and rests against the central part of the disk. Here is the most interesting. The speed of rotation of water in the central region is higher than the speed of rotation of the disc! The water "pushes" the disk in the direction of rotation. The rotating stream supports itself! Almost like a perpetual motion machine. But as always, friction forces interfere. And the process is quite stable and low-damping. By the way, a little distracted: if you spin water in an ordinary bucket, even without the help of a disk, the water will still rotate according to the same laws and the water will rotate for quite a long time, because here there is self-support of water rotation - just no one ever pays attention to it (it is enough to tightly close the lid of the bucket filled exactly to the brim - the rotation will stop pretty quickly). What do I want to say? Only one thing - a vortex is very easy to obtain when spinning a liquid or gas under unequal conditions of rotation from above and below, and this is an almost ready-made self-supporting system. You need quite a bit of energy and the process will be undamped. Moreover: the vortex absorbs energy in the form of heat from the environment! Now I will try to explain. Consider a simplified diagram of the Schauberger engine. If we ignore everything secondary, then the design fits into the following simple scheme, which in fact is nothing more than a continuation of the idea glass Einstein A.

Inside at the top - a rotating disk (red). Below is a small vertically standing plate. This achieves uneven conditions during rotation for the lower and upper layers of water (air?). On the left is a heat exchanger (more on that later). Above - a motor-generator, at first it works as a process starter, after entering the tornado mode - to extract energy. The valve on the heat exchanger is a process switch. Arrow on the left - heated environment working body of the device.

What happens during the operation of this device? Everything is simple. Centrifugal forces create increased pressure at the walls of the vessel. And a vacuum in the central part. Due to the higher angular velocity of rotation of the upper layers of water (air) in comparison with the lower ones, a meridional flow is created, descending along the walls of the vessel. And rising in the central part (in nature, this is nothing more than a "tornado trunk"). Liquid (gas), moving along its sophisticated trajectory, then gets into the area of compression, then into the area of rarefaction. Let's remember the simplest law of physics - the Boyle-Mariotte law. If we take a certain mass of gas, then with forced compression, the gas heats up. And when rarefied, it cools. It is in the central part of the device that the water-air mixture enters the region of forced rarefaction by centrifugal forces. In this case, for a finite mass of gas, decrease in temperature and increase in volume. This increase in volume gives an increase in the kinetic movement of the flow from bottom to top along the central axis of the device. This recharged jet with new energy enters the turbine disk, causing it to spin faster and produce an even more intense whirlwind. which creates an even higher vacuum, and so on and so forth. The cooled moist air is expelled by centrifugal force into the heat exchanger tube. Ideally, the temperature of the heat exchanger is near absolute zero. The environment surrounding the heat exchanger, which is normal from our point of view, is an "environment with excess energy". The heat exchanger is heated by it and the thermal energy enters the inside of the device, eventually converting into the rotation of a "self-turning donut" from moist air inside the device.

I want to make a small note about the Ranque effect (temperature separation of a gas jet in the so-called "Ranque tubes"). No one really explains this effect. And in my opinion, everything is simple. There is the Boyle-Mariotte law (the product of pressure and volume at a constant temperature is a constant value) and everything happens according to this law. The gas circulating in the meridional direction in our device alternately experiences either compression or rarefaction. It heats up, then cools down in relation to the "normal" temperature. That's the whole effect of temperature separation. By the way, no one tried to inject water there? Should be a very interesting effect. Something like passing the "dew point" with a sharp cooling.

By the way, we can draw an interesting conclusion: but in this device it is also oscillatory process! And oscillations have a resonance - a sharp increase in amplitude with a minimum input of energy! Can you imagine how it is possible to stabilize the effect when finding here the dependencies between the amplitude of oscillations and all the influencing parameters? temperature resonance! It sounds good. And it can find excellent application in refrigeration machines.

It is my deep conviction that Schauberger was a great man and undeservedly unknown. It seems to me that he still managed to build a generator that extracts energy, it seems, from " NOTHING". More precisely, directly from the environment. Even if this is done very inefficiently, the freeness of this energy should outweigh all the arguments against it. What is still surprising? On the Internet, you can find quite a lot of information about the works of Schauberger. But, apparently, so far there is no technological revolution in energy production.It seems that there are photographs and drawings of structures.However, all the descriptions of the operation of the engine that I have met so far are so unintelligibly monotonous (and from my point of view are absolutely incorrect) that it becomes immediately clear - nothing working is simply No. I do not pretend to be the ultimate truth. Everything that is described on my website is a chain of continuous contradictions and inaccuracies. Only I am convinced that the engine is a generator with amazing properties that generates, or rather concentrates, energy from the energy of the environment is quite possible and can be manufactured right now.The socio-economic consequences of such an invention, of course, oh, will have no conceivable boundaries. This is a complete solution to energy problems and a change in the concept of vehicles.

Based on the foregoing, it remains only to draw a specific design. Well then. As a hypothetical, "virtual" engine, I propose the following "pan":

Vortex motor-generator

This device can perform the following functions:

1. Energy generator. Rather, a concentrator of energy from the environment. Do not turn your tongue to say "perpetual motion machine of the 2nd kind."

2. heat engine- the possibilities for cooling and air conditioning are especially great. By the way, the working fluid here is not necessarily water-air. It is possible air and freon.

3. Gravitational mechanism. That's a pretty cheeky statement, but I'll try to explain. And in 2 ways.

3.1. The effect of weight loss of rapidly rotating masses is known. Why does it depend? Let's go back to Fig. Everta. It is clear that with such rotation of air, incredible speeds can be achieved (due to a small mass of air). The device is not in danger of destruction, unlike, for example, a metal flywheel. By and large, despite the complexity of the trajectory, each point of this trajectory moves tangentially to the surface of the earth. And it is quite possible to achieve a linear speed of 8 km/sec on this trajectory. An artificial satellite with an orbit of 1 meter? Will there be levitation? Hm...

3.2. Once upon a time, I got into the hands of the TM magazine with an article on gravitational mechanisms (inertioids). It described about 10 types of mechanisms and immediately explained. why they can not fully work, that is, fly. True, at the end of the article it was stated that there was still no final verdict on the operation of such devices and the question was open. Therefore, I suggest number 11. At one time, I was very interested in the rotation of a simple flywheel on the axis of an electric motor. I had the motor in my hands. Its power was 70 watts., 7000 rpm at U = 24v, the flywheel was an aluminum disk with a diameter of 10 cm, weighing 200 grams. I explain in detail. so that those who wish can try it for themselves. Unless, of course, it is interesting. When the handwheel is rotated, there is a complete feeling that you are already holding a working inertioid in your hands! It is enough to rotate the design around the hand - and a complete illusion of incomprehensible thrust in a very specific direction. Such an interesting effect is given by rotation around 2 axes simultaneously (the axis of the motor and the axis of the hand). Then an idea appeared which now, in a strange way, intersected with the essence of the Schauberger engine. Previously, it seemed to me frank nonsense, though quite interesting. I'll probably draw a little later.

And now a small conclusion to what is stated on this page. Some general basic principles can be formulated for the operation of devices that produce mechanical energy by "absorbing" energy from the environment:

1. A process is generated that is on the verge of self-support (for example, in hydraulics, a closed vortex like an Einstein glass is an extremely unstable and rather inertial state: examples are very often - a spinning funnel of water, air, a natural tornado; in electrical engineering - an electric motor and a dynamo connected on the same axis ). For real self-support, it is necessary to add external energy to such a system. Sometimes very small, compensating for friction or resistance losses.

2. Hyperbolizing process. Up to the resonance that occurs in such a device (in a vortex - heating and cooling of a water-air mixture, in electrical engineering, the induction of electromagnetic fields is obvious) ..

3. "Inversion" of the structure in relation to the environment in such a way that some part of this structure will have energy with a sharply reduced energy potential and become an energy absorber of the environment (for example, in hydraulics - the central part of the Schauberger engine - ideally this space is approximate to absolute zero in temperature and pressure, therefore, the ordinary medium surrounding this part of the engine has an "excess" of energy. In electrical engineering - it's more complicated here - the overlap and resonance of fields is obvious, I'll leave the idea unfinished for now).

4. The release of energy "absorbed" from the outside from closed space devices in the form of mechanical or electrical energy.

Vivid examples of such devices:

Schauberger engine and very similar Clem engine

In electrical engineering, the Tesla generator and the Searl generator.

Now we can assume what was inside Schauberger's Repulsine. Most likely it was a design similar to the illustration below. The vortex formed in the central part absorbs with the help of a heat exchanger (essentially a conventional centrifugal pump) that minimum heat from the air passing through the turbine blades, which is necessary to maintain rotation. The engine starts when the turbine spins up and a small amount of water is injected from below. Probably, after entering the tornado mode, water is no longer needed and only air is the working fluid. The pressure inside the engine during operation is lowered in the center, increased at the periphery. The Rank effect "works" to the full extent. Rather, it should work even more pronounced than in the "Ranque tubes" (this is because the air swirling in the Ranque tubes is thrown out instantly and rather wastefully, and here this effect "accumulates" during cyclic meridional rotation). Cooled from below, the heat exchanger-turbine is heated from above by the forced ambient air. The rejection of this cooled air creates the usual jet thrust.

In short, if it really works (I believe, if the Schauberger engine really existed, then it was something like this design) - we can consider it an absolutely universal engine-propulsion-generator. Super-ecological and fuel-free. With a stream of cold air as an exhaust.

Vortex motor-generator-propulsion

The design in terms of manufacturability is at the level of the beginning of the last century, maybe even earlier. Looks like a regular vacuum cleaner. Its simplicity makes you wonder - does it work? But I don't see much of a contradiction. I think this picture can get significant distribution on the Internet. At least as a discussion.

An industrial power generation plant might look something like this:

Vortex Power Plant Block (energy cell?)

The design is extremely simple. Who said that the "trunk of a tornado" should be directed downwards? Let's turn everything upside down (by the way, in Schauberger's pencil sketch at the top of the page is also questionable - where is "top and bottom"). In this way, the generation of an artificial vortex is greatly simplified. What is needed to form a vortex? The answer is - some ambient heat, moisture, and initial swirling of a mass of moist air. Ordinary water is poured into a bowl-shaped container. At the initial stage, the motor-generator, with the help of a turbine with spiral blades, begins to twist the water-air cone, and after the structure has entered the tornado mode, absorption of heat from the surrounding air , acceleration of the movement of rarefied air along the center of the vortex And the pressure of this flow on the turbine blades. The motor-generator can be switched to the energy harvesting mode. I leave the description of the operation of the installation as minimal - the picture is extremely clear. Although the processes occurring in this device are much more complex and diverse (I deliberately omitted the formation of a minitornado when the main vortex occurs, as well as possible electrostatic effects). In this picture, I was just trying to highlight the main thing - vortex self-support process is possible and in my opinion is quite simple. I don’t know what height the resulting vortex will have (it’s quite possible - this installation can become the “rotor” of a full-scale natural tornado in an open area). And if in nature the process of formation of vortices occurs all the time, and sometimes it seems to be for no reason at all, then I propose to treat this device as a set of glands and other details that contribute to the "civilized" emergence of a very common natural phenomenon.

A separate question about the dimensions of this design. Criticism on the Internet does not like a different image when someone starts talking about the significant size of the proposed structures. Therefore, I will not talk about gigantic dimensions (such a negative example is the Messiah machine with a diameter of 50 meters). Much more I like the description of the Schauberger Home Machine Power - the dimensions of this device are about 1 meter in diameter. By the way, what I propose is a kind of symbiosis between these two devices. Only structurally simpler and perhaps better. And the minimum dimensions are still determined by the laws of nature - I have never seen an air vortex in wildlife less than a meter (a simple example is the usual turbulences on a dusty road). But if you imagine the maximum dimensions of such a station! The imagination can easily draw a huge installation in an open area, which will provoke the emergence of a real tornado in all its crushing power. Only this tornado is "tamed", therefore it always stands in one place - exactly above the power plant. And if you build a complex of large-scale vortex power plants that cool the surrounding space? Here we can already talk about the impact on the climate! It would be a wonderful contribution to the fight against global warming. Here is a little fantasy on the subject:

These structures, it seems to me, can be made within very wide limits in terms of size and power, but the most obvious is as a small-sized autonomous source of energy (for example, for a detached house). Remember how personal computers "filled up" at one time "large computers"? We need to be closer to the consumer!

Everything certainly looks pretty fantastic, but still I want to enhance the impression. And finally figure out what is implosion, which Schauberger constantly talked about and try to understand - what did he want to offer?

Let's start with the fact that the entire technogenic civilization currently depends on Explosions. From Latin it is an explosion, an exhaust. The work of any modern heat engine (left side of the figure) is the combustion of fuel in some volume, a sharp increase in temperature and expansion of the working fluid as a result of this combustion. The working fluid increased in volume presses on the piston, the turbine, it is simply discarded to obtain a reactive impulse. Almost any engine runs on the expansion process as a result of fuel combustion, constantly wasting non-renewable resources in the form of gas-oil-coal-uranium. I don’t even want to talk about the waste of such technology - you can imagine. But after all, the expansion of the working body can be obtained as a result of a completely different process! An example is a natural tornado. I'll try to explain a little. Let's imagine. that in some container they began to rotate the working fluid. In the simplest case, this is ordinary air, as in this figure on the right (a miniature model of a natural tornado). In the central part, an accelerating upward trend will immediately appear. forward movement. There are at least 3 reasons for this:

1. At the expense underpressure by centrifugal force the central part of the vortex some an increase in volume for a finite mass of gas and a decrease in its temperature. From the sides, this mass is "supported" by the walls of the vessel, from below its bottom. There is only one way to expand - up.

2. On rarefied part of the gas in the central part Archimedes' law applies- a lighter body "floats" - something like a balloon, only without a shell.

3. The third reason is the most exotic. When air rotates, it acquires a significant electric potential. Positive in the center, negative in the periphery. Despite its simplicity, this tornado model (and the tornado itself in the original) is an excellent electrostatic generator (the theory of the emergence of such an electric potential is best reflected in the materials on the Searl generator). In a real tornado, a magnitude of millions of volts is reached and manifests itself in the constant occurrence of lightning in the "eye of the tornado" and its "trunk". Thus, in the body of a tornado, in the presence of such a high voltage, the air becomes electrified. A charges of the same name as is known repel! (positively charged air molecules - devoid of electrons, repel each other). This way it happens increase in gas pressure due to electrostatic forces!. And this extension again gives an additional impetus to the upward movement of air. I wonder if such an effect is formulated in physics - an increase in the volume of gas when it is electrified? If not, why are you not discovering? Rummaging around the Internet, I didn’t find anything like that, but the effect should clearly be. I want to explain everything that has been said with this cartoon and try to prove that tornado is an electrostatic machine, and structurally the simplest. On the Internet, you can find enough designs where the rotor is a simple dielectric cylinder, on the sides of which a high voltage of several tens of kilovolts is simply applied. An avalanche of charged particles flowing between the electrodes simply turns the rotor cylinder.

With this cartoon (a section of a tornado), I want to summarize what the authors of such structures offer and offer their answer to the question - why does the tornado actually rotate?

electrostatic

tornado model

Consider a cross section of a tornado. We will see something like a ball bearing. Research

If you want to receive news on Facebook, click "like" ×

//= \app\modules\Comment\Service::render(\app\modules\Comment\Model::TYPE_ARTICLE, $item["id"]); ?>

To date, the question of the existence of aliens remains open, since the current technological level of humanity limits our ability to search for extraterrestrial life. However, ufologists somehow advanced on this issue and even began to publish guides on the topic "What is the alien spaceship made of."

UFO structure

Ufologist Leonard Stringfield presented to the public an analysis of documents that came to him, allegedly related to American government services. The documents contain a report on the inspection of a mysterious object called a "flying disk" back in 1947. The cover letter contains the opinion of experts that the device is not a creation of human hands. The object is similar in appearance to a disk-shaped platform, no external propulsion system was found, as well as a power plant, propellers and jet engines. During the inspection of the interior, something similar to an atomic motor was found. Experts suggested that the disk itself is a propulsion system, while heat transfer processes occur in the reactor.

Also found was a round tube made of a material similar to, but not plastic. The disk reached eleven meters in length. The aforementioned tube was inserted into the copper coil, which passed through its body. Perhaps, with the help of this process, reactive control was carried out, or the device played the role of a storage battery.

The object is believed to have had a cloaking system that allowed it to appear "out of nowhere". Perhaps the disk was simply moving at great speed from one point to another, so the effect of disappearing and appearing was created. There is also an assumption that a special shield was installed on the plate, which did not allow it to be seen with the naked eye. This explains those cases when people detected objects in photographs of the sky, but while the eye could not detect them there. It is worth noting that there is no evidence that this was not camera glitches.

Types of unidentified flying objects

Having studied the numerous testimonies of people who have seen UFOs, one can combine their diversity into several groups.

The first group includes small spherical or disk-shaped objects with a radius of 10 to 50 cm, such objects usually fly low (or they are simply difficult to notice when they fly high). The first evidence of the existence of such an object came from North Dakota.

The second group includes egg-shaped or disc-shaped objects, but with a large radius - 1-1.5 meters, they also do not fly too high, often landing on the surface.

The third group includes huge disks with a radius of 5-20 meters, which move in all atmospheric layers. There has not been a single case of landing of such objects, they may serve as vehicles for transporting smaller UFOs.

The impact of unidentified flying objects on equipment and people

UFOs have different effects on earth technology. Ufologists have observed various cases: sometimes the proximity of a UFO causes just a strange rotation of the compass needle, sometimes a plane crash. It is assumed that such an impact is associated with the force field of the UFO. Because of it, there is a violation of the mechanisms of electronic and mechanical watches, failure of radio equipment, engine shutdown, etc.

There is evidence of the impact of UFOs on people. In 1979, a UFO came close to a Polish fishing boat. Then the captain of the ship rarely became ill, he became numb and almost blind, pains began in his heart. He was seized by a strong panic, which was not typical for the captain. It is believed that such an impact is caused by a special radiation of the high-frequency electromagnetic field of the UFO. Often a person began to experience growing excitement, which gradually turned into a disorder of the mental system.

It is worth noting that the above facts were obtained from the words of ufologists and UFO eyewitnesses and are not confirmed information.

What is the engine of the UFO? That's a very difficult question. Numerous "thought experiments" have been conducted by scientists and amateurs alike on how alien spaceships might work (on paper, since both amateurs and scientists don't have the right hardware).

Many books on the subject were written by Paul R. Hill in 1995, James McCampbell (70s), Leonard J. Cramp (1966), Plantier (1953). They all approached the UFO phenomenon from the point of view of the "mad scientist" trade, and their theories for explaining the maneuvering of alien ships were based on the idea that the source of their movement was hard-wired to the ship.

Physical aspect

If we want to explain UFOs in terms of physics, which we understand, but at the same time we will rely on observations, then, apparently, we can assume that they are capable of generating artificial gravitational fields (in terms of general relativity - to manipulate the curvature of the fabric of space - time), just as we produce magnetism with electric currents.

Bright light

It is believed that the glow of different colors around the UFO is due to the ionization of the surrounding air. The atmosphere around them seems to "light up", it is very similar to what happens in neon lamps. This is a kind of "plasma shell". Changes in the brightness and color of the "plasma shell" are apparently related to the operation of the engine.

Ionization of air and radiation

Air ionization appears to be caused by electromagnetic radiation emitted by ships and is thought to be a secondary effect of the propulsion system. This includes ultraviolet radiation (as evidenced by many cases of eye and skin irritation of people who have personally observed alien ships) and soft x-rays (as evidenced by traces of a “burn ring” on the ground where flying saucers landed). Given the difficulty of generating plasma under normal atmospheric conditions, combined with other observations such as the luminosity of underwater UFOs, the sudden appearance of condensate/fog on launch under high humidity and no noise suggests a shell with a lower density than the atmosphere around flying saucers.

UFO and antigravity. The principle of operation of the UFO engine. Scientific substantiation of the operation of the UFO engine

Vladimir Zabelyshensky

UFO and antigravity.

The modern level of science allows us to conclude that there are three main forces in the Universe: gravity, magnetism and electricity. This statement was the result of the work of a number of prominent scientists, which, first of all, include Faraday, Maxwell, Planck and Einstein. In 1923, their followers - American scientists Brown and Bifield, California Institute for Special Studies, investigating the connection between electricity and gravity, came to the discovery of the effect of electrogravity. This discovery was the beginning of the development of a completely new scientific direction. Brown showed that for every electromagnetic phenomenon there is an electrogravitational analogue, in particular, the movement of a charged body under the influence of the interaction between electric and gravitational fields in the direction of the positive electrode. In 1939, Brown created the theory of electrogravity and then developed it into the field of electrohydrodynamics.

It is noteworthy that the Brown effect was not predicted, even to any first approximation, either by the Theory of Relativity or by modern theories of electromagnetism. As soon as Brown's theory of electrogravity became available to scientists and technical specialists of aerospace centers, it struck with the simplicity of implementation and the highest degree of experimental evidence of all the provisions of the theory. However, even at the end of the 20th century, despite the practical implementation of the Brown effect in the creation of fundamentally new aircraft, many, due to their ignorance, consider the gravitational engine an obscure exotic.

The essence of electrogravity is that a flat capacitor charged with a high DC voltage tends to move towards the positive pole, due to a decrease in its weight /1/. The change in the weight of the capacitor depending on the polarity of the voltage applied to it is shown in Fig.1.

Fig.1. The change in the weight of a capacitor depending on the polarity of the voltage applied to it.

The experiments revealed the fundamental features:

The dielectric material between the two plates of a capacitor must be capable of storing electrical energy in the form of an “elastic” voltage without corona discharge and subsequent breakdown at the edges of the capacitor, for example, in the form of a disk. The measure of this ability is the “k” factor of the material. The higher the value of this coefficient, the greater the effect of electrogravity;

The effect of the movement of a freely suspended capacitor is directly proportional to the area of the capacitor plates and the magnitude of the voltage applied to the plates;

The effect of electrogravity becomes more pronounced as the mass of the dielectric material between the plates increases. (Patent T. T. Brown, 3 187 206 dated June 1, 1965, USA).

The distribution of an electric charge of a certain polarity over the sectors of the upper and lower surfaces of a flat capacitor allows you to control the direction of movement of the capacitor. Figures 2 and 3 show the principle of changing the direction of the flight of objects according to the theory of electrogravity.

Fig.3. The principle of changing the direction of flight of objects.

In his experiments, Brown used models of objects in the form of a triangle, a square, a square truncated at the corners with faces, and a saucer. He ultimately concluded that the most effective shape was the saucer shape. Analysis of the flight of the saucer in Brown's experiments showed that during the flight of the model in the air none of the known aerodynamic principles of the wing is used.

Considering electrogravity in relation to UFOs, we must keep in mind some features of its flight. As is known, the Earth is surrounded by a gravitational field, the magnitude of which decreases with distance from the Earth and, ultimately, becomes equal to zero. The UFO, by creating an area of its own gravitational field, changes (deforms) the gravitational field of the Earth. This area acts like a wave with a negative pole at the top of the wave and a positive pole at its bottom. The flight of a UFO is like a surfer sliding on a wave. Thus, by changing the orientation and sign (polarity) of the electric field on the upper and lower surfaces of the body, the UFO is able to move without inertia in any direction. As you know, there are some stably observed features of the flight of UFOs. So, before starting from a hovering position, the UFO leans forward, before stopping in level flight, it leans back. The descent of a UFO, as a rule, occurs by the “falling leaf” method, reminiscent of the movement of a pendulum. Paul Hill, who studied these flight characteristics at NASA's Langley Research Center, came to the conclusion that such evolutions of UFO flight are contrary to aerodynamic requirements, but are fully compatible with the fundamental differences in the operation of a field anti-gravity system.

Experimenting with various forms of his flying models, Brown describes the process of generating the driving force, due to which controlled flight is carried out. In accordance with the theory of electrogravity, the upper part of the dome-shaped disk is an anode, which is under a positive charge of 100-200 kV. The cathode, to which a negative charge is applied, is the central lower part of the case, the diameter of which is approximately 3 times smaller than the upper, domed part of the disk. The dome is mechanically connected to the small anode part by an electrode located vertically in the center of the disk.

The ion plasma, moving at high speed towards the concave part of the dome, creates pressure along the entire anode profile, which leads, in a particular case, to a vertical movement of the disk. The plasma that escaped the dome returns with acceleration to the cathode. An intrinsic gravitational field is created both inside the volume of the disk and in the peripheral region outside the disk. The electrical model of Brown's disk is shown in Figure 4./2/.

Fig.4. Brown's electrical disk model.

The main conclusion following from Brown's theory, confirmed in the experiment, is that there is an electromagnetic correlation factor between the gravitational mass and the inertial mass, which, under certain electromagnetic conditions, can be reduced, canceled, inverted or increased.

Demonstration flights of Brown discs, 1m in diameter. and more, around a high mast with power-through-wire, have shown that a low-pressure region is created in front of the leading edge of the disk. This area, like a buffer wing, displaces the air in front of the flying disk, which eliminates the occurrence of a supersonic barrier and heating of the disk body. Speaking to scientists and representatives of the aviation industry, Brown already then noted that the electromagnetic processes accompanying the flight cause not only the glow of the disk, but also a negative effect on animals and plants.

Observations of low-flying or low-altitude UFOs, as well as the detection of the so-called. step voltage on the surface of the earth during their landings, confirm the presence of an electric field around the UFO. The intensity of this field, according to indirect estimates, is 1 - 1.5 million volts per square meter. see UFO surfaces, which corresponds to the calculated values obtained in Brown's experiments.

In 1953, Brown held a demonstration for senior military officials. He showed the flight of two discs 3 feet in diameter. They reached speeds of several hundred miles per hour. Soon, work in this direction was classified.

During the Winterhaven project, Brown sent a proposal to the Pentagon to develop a disk-shaped electrogravity combat aircraft of the Mach-3 type (Mach-3). It was a much improved version of his test discs shown earlier. Using large vacuum chambers, Brown showed that his discs could fly more efficiently in an airless environment. This made a proper impression on the specialists of the US military department.

As soon as Brown's discoveries gained publicity, some scientists began talking openly about UFO flight technology. None other than Professor Hermann Oeberg, who is considered the father of the space age, who later worked with Wernher von Braun for the US Army Ballistic Missile Agency and NASA, stated the following in 1954: “It is my thesis that flying saucers are real and are spaceships from another solar system. They fly using artificial gravity fields... They produce high-voltage electric charges in order to push air out of their way, while the air begins to glow in strong electromagnetic fields as a result of ionization of the molecules of various gases in the air.

Firstly, this can explain the glow ... Secondly, this can explain the noiselessness of the UFO flight ...” /3/. We now know that, in fact, he was right in his assessment. - Counselor of the Physical Society of Russia, exploring Brown's developments, notes that the active force acting in electrogravity is the result of the asymmetry of the orbital motion of electrons in atoms of a dielectric located in an electric field. The asymmetry creates a centrifugal force gradient and a non-zero linear component of this force. If we take the surface area of the dome equal to 100 sq. m. electric capacitance will be about 1 microfarad. The use of special ceramics as a dielectric makes it possible to increase the dielectric constant (specific capacitance) up to 80. At a potential of 100 kV. the gradient of the acting force will be equal to 80 tons. Since the magnitude of the force increases in a quadratic dependence on the applied potential, it is advisable to increase the potential, and not the surface of the dome or the object as a whole. Thus, the essence of electrogravity propulsion is to use a very strong positive charge on one side of the vehicle and a negative charge on the other. The ability of a capacitor to hold a charge (K-factor) is a comparative specification. If the K coefficient for ordinary dielectrics is 6-8, then the use of barium titanate oxide (sintered ceramics) gives a coefficient of 6.000 with the prospect of bringing it up to 30.000, which is quite enough for supersonic flight.” /4/ Calculation of the gradient of the acting force is shown in figure 1.

F=qE0(1/ε1-1/ε2)

ε1=1 ε2=80 (ceramics)

area S=100m2

capacitance C0=10-6F; C= ε2C0=8×10-5F

potential φ=105 V

charge q=CU=8K

field strength E=105 i/m

F=8×105(79/80)=7.9×105(N)

F=7.9/9.8×105=80T

Fig.1. Calculation of the gradient of the acting force.

In one of their conclusions, based on Brown's work, experts note the following: “Electrostatic energy sufficient to implement the Mak-3 apparatus is possible using megavolt voltages and a K factor of more than 10,000″ /5/.

Despite Brown's thorough research, they further point out that: “One of the major difficulties in 1954 and 1955 was the effort to convince aviators of the seriousness of electrogravity experiments /6/. Report of the British company Gravity Rand Ltd. in 1956 is consistent with this assessment /7/.

Aviation Report made numerous references to anti-gravity projects and cited many of the companies involved in research in this area. The quotes from this magazine, given in the report of the company "Aviation Studies (International) Ltd." /8/ hint at what is going on behind the scenes.

In 1954, the company's specialists note that: “… progress was slow. But there are indications that the Pentagon is willing to sponsor a number of devices to help further progress”... will be available ten years from now.” (Aviation Report, No.12, October 1954) /9/.

During this time period, many of the major companies in the military-industrial complex were cited as leading research projects and trials in the field. For example: “Among the companies studying the application of gravity mentioned in the new statement are Glenn Martin, Conware, Sperry-Rand, Sikorsky, Bell, Liar Inc. and Clark Electronics. Of the other companies that showed interest earlier, we note Lockheed. Other of the reports mentioned point to AT&T, General Electric, and Curtis-Wright, Boeing, and North American as having electrogravity research groups. During the same period of time, a Gravity Rand report notes that: “Already companies specialize in the development of individual components of the electrogravity disk” /11/. However, in the field of predictions, the Evolution Report states the following based on extrapolation of technological advances: “Thus, this century will be divided into two parts - almost to the present day. The first part is due to the Wright brothers, who anticipated almost every major law in which gravity was a formidable opponent. In the second part, gravity will be the great breadwinner.

Electric energy, practically inapplicable for movement in the first part, becomes a kind of catalyst for movement in the second part of the century.” (Aviation Report, No.7, September 1954) /12/.

Looking back in history, it is easy to say that they have lost the point of dividing. Had they really lost her for half a century? After reading the reports mentioned, it becomes quite obvious that there was a lot of interest in anti-gravity among a number of very well-known companies, as well as in the Department of Defense. What happened to that interest, and why did it fade over the next four-plus decades? In the end, T. Brown showed that there is a provable connection between high voltage fields and gravity. Why was this topic kept from the scientific community and publications in the open literature until the 90s? A review of recent statements by former military and civilian employees working in connection with secret projects sheds light on research activity in these areas in the second half of the century. And it turns out that significant breakthroughs were made during this period, but they were hidden from the eyes of scientists and the public.

Recent scientific developments.

In this section, we look at developments in anti-gravity since the late 1980s, as well as scientific findings and eyewitness accounts associated with military and secret groups that indicate that a solution to gravity has been found that can be applied to technology. Although general relativity has been unable to explain Brown's electrogravitational theory, as well as any other antigravitational phenomena, physicists' recent findings on the methodology of quantum electrodynamics allow us to offer a theoretical framework with which to explain electrogravity.

The latest works of the staff of the Institute for Advanced Studies of the Alpha Foundation provide a solid theoretical foundation for antigravitational effects in the framework of the theory of electrodynamics and include reports by Evans /13/, Anastasotsky /14/ and others.

Earlier, in his groundbreaking work in 1994, Alcubière showed that

that space travel at superluminal speed is, in principle, physically possible and will not contradict the foundations of the theory of relativity /15/. Puthoff, later analyzed these definitions in light of the existing SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) paradigms, which state that we cannot be visited by extraterrestrial civilizations due to the light speed limitations imposed by general relativity. On the contrary, he believes that traveling at the speed of light is undoubtedly possible /16/. This leads to a decrease in the time required for interstellar travel and the possibility of a visit by extraterrestrial civilizations. Our limited understanding of physics and scientific arrogance kept it all taboo in some areas for most of the 20th century. While Brown's Electrogravity Theory has found its way into US aerospace projects, there are alternative theoretical approaches to creating artificial, controlled gravity.

In 1999 Fran Di Aquino, Doctor of Physics at the University of San Luis, Brazil, has published a number of papers on the theory of aircraft using the antigravity principle. In the work “Gravity and electromagnetism; correlation and grand unification”/17/ he showed that gravitational and inertial masses are correlated taking into account the electromagnetic coefficient (multiplier). The consequences of this correlation make it possible to transform the Mach Principle into the Theory of Gravity, obtaining a new relativistic expression for mass. In addition, it became possible to generalize Newton's second law for motion, to calculate the differential equation for entropy (the second law of Thermodynamics) directly from the Theory of Gravity. Another fundamental consequence of the considered correlation is that, in specific ultrahigh energy states, gravitational and electromagnetic fields can be described by the same Hamilton function.

Attempts to establish a correlation between gravitational and inertial masses have been made since Newton. However, it has only recently been established that a gravitational particle reduces its mass with increasing temperature and that only at absolute zero (T=0) are gravitational and inertial masses equivalent.Fran Di Aquino showed that the long-standing assumption of a correlation between gravity and electromagnetism turned out to be correct. Initially, using formal methods, it was shown that there is a so-called. electromagnetic coefficient (multiplier), which is related to gravitational and inertial masses. Now there is a possibility of theoretical substantiation of the process of controlling the gravitational mass.

As has been shown, the inertial effects of a material body can be reduced and even canceled if its gravitational mass can be reduced or canceled accordingly. A particle with no gravitational mass is not subject to relativistic effects. Its gravitational mass does not increase with the speed of the particle. It is interesting to note that according to Di Aquino, this means that a particle with no gravitational mass can reach the speed of light and even surpass it. Such a particle is characterized by two fundamental parameters: it becomes a particle with momentum Р=0 and energy Е=0. These "ghosts" of neutrinos are so named because, without having momentum and energy, they cannot be detected. But even so, their presence can be confirmed by an existing wave function that describes their presence.

Inertial forces in the modern version are expressed as Fi=miai, while the equivalent gravitational forces, Fg=mgag. In this case, the equivalence ai=ag. Therefore, the equations of the General Theory of Relativity will be preserved. It is known that photons do not have inertial mass, do not absorb other photons, and do not have gravitational mass. If we consider a certain source of electromagnetic radiation with a certain power, frequency and beam density, then in accordance with Aquino's theory, it is possible to create a so-called “shield” of photons around this source, which will prevent the exchange of gravitons between particles in the “shield” and the rest of space ( universe). Region “ shield” begins at a distance from the source, where the beam density reaches a value at which photons will counteract each graviton in the electromagnetic field of the source. Moreover, these interactions are instantaneous, since the speed of photons in this case should be infinite, because they are quanta of electromagnetic interaction. It is this speed of photons that will be in “ shield."

If we imagine a spacecraft with a positive gravitational mass equal to X kg, and a negative gravitational mass equal to, for example, 0.001 kg, then this condition is sufficient to create a “shield” by photons emanating from the surface of the spacecraft. In this case, the gravitational mass of the ship will be equal to 0.001 kg. If the ship's propulsion system creates only F=10N, the spacecraft will acquire an acceleration equal to 104m/s.Thus, due to the photon "shield" around the spacecraft, its gravitational interaction with the Universe will be absent. Consequently, the inertial forces on the spacecraft will also be absent, in other words, the ship will lose its inertial properties. In addition, a spacecraft can not only reach the speed of light, but exceed it, because, as has been shown, a particle with no gravitational mass will not be subject to relativistic effects. The key issue of today is the creation of a compact source of electrical energy that allows obtaining voltages of more than 1 MV and electric fields with a strength of 1-1.5 MV per square meter. see aircraft surfaces. There are several solutions to this issue, including the conversion of nuclear energy or the use of the energy of the vacuum state.

Energy of the vacuum state.

The most revolutionary physical discoveries are made in relation to the energy of zero-point vibrations or the energy of the vacuum state, which is illustrated by the Casimir effect, according to which two metal plates put together attract each other due to an imbalance of quantum vibrations. The prospects for using the energy of zero-point oscillations or the energy of the vacuum state are grandiose. Einstein's student John Wheeler once said: "Figuratively speaking, the vacuum energy contained in the volume of a coffee cup would be enough to evaporate all the oceans of the Earth." The theoretical foundations of the energy of the vacuum state have been described in several works by Puthoff since the end of the 1980s /18,19/.

Physicist Stephen Greer, commenting on the research and practical achievements of scientists at the University of New Hampshire at a radio briefing on January 30, 2003, noted that, judging by the amazing devices that he saw in operation, by mid-2004 the United States will be able to create industrial designs. energy converters of vibrations of subatomic particles of free vacuum into electrical energy. “They are exceptionally compact, lightweight devices with no moving parts. I want to tell you that the UFO mystery has been a mystery for decades for one, the most important reason - we needed to have time to monopolize the study of the energy source in UFOs.

Various technological methods for extracting this energy are described - the latest works by Anastasocki et al. /20/. Bearden's book on zero-point energy theory /21/ will appear soon. There is considerable evidence to support that scientists since Tesla have been aware of this energy, but its existence and potential uses have been hidden for more than half a century /22/.

The connection between observations of electrogravitational phenomena and the discovery of zero-point energy leads to a new, expanded understanding of the nature of matter and gravity. We turn to the next question: what keeps the universe in perpetual motion? Or, more specifically, where do electrons get their energy to keep spinning around atoms? The simplistic answer is that it comes from a vacuum state. Puthoff /23/ describes the process as follows: “I found that we can think of an electron as continuously radiating its energy, as the classical theory says, but at the same time absorbing a compensating amount of energy from the omnipresent zero-point energy ocean in which the atom is immersed. The balance between these two processes leads to the correct values of the parameters that determine the minimum energy or orbit of the ground state.

Thus, there is a dynamic equilibrium in which the zero-point energy stabilizes the electron in the orbit of the ground state. It turns out that the stability of matter itself depends on the ocean of zero-point electromagnetic energy supporting it.”

Moreover, it turns out that the rotation of the electrons provides inertia and mass for the atoms. These theories linking electron spin, zero-point energy, mass and inertia have been presented in a number of recent scientific papers, of which Heisch and colleagues are noted for providing a possible explanation for the Biefeld-Brown effect. It turns out that the high voltage field creates an electromagnetic barrier that blocks the atomic structure of the atom from interacting with the field of zero vibrations. This slows down the electrons, reducing their gyroscopic effect and thus their mass and inertia, making them easier to move around.

This inexhaustible source of energy will make it possible to abandon the use of all types of fuel, to transfer any transport, industrial and social facilities to electricity consumption thanks to vacuum energy.

Searle's gravitational disks.

In 1946 prof. John Searle, UK, made a fundamental discovery in the field of the nature of magnetism. Working in Mortimer, Borkshire, he discovered that in the manufacture of permanent magnets based on ferrites, adding a small component of alternating current, within 100mA, with a frequency of 10MHz, to the magnetizing field, the magnets acquire completely new properties /24/. In Searl's experiments, it was shown that if magnets in the form of rollers made using a new technology are placed around the outside of the ring magnet, then with a certain number of rollers, they come into independent movement around the ring magnet. Once in motion, the rollers increase their speed until dynamic equilibrium is reached. It was also found that when the magnetic rollers rotate, the device creates an electrostatic potential difference, the vector of which is directed along the radius from the rollers to the ring magnet. In this case, the fixed ring is positively charged, and the rollers are negatively charged. The interaction of centrifugal force and magnets creates a constant gap between the moving rollers and the ring, resulting in no mechanical or galvanic contact between the ring and the rollers.

Complementing the design with a fixed electromagnet, Searl received a current generator with a power of about 500 watts. The appearance of the simplest design of the Searl electric generator is shown in Figure 5.

In 1952, Searle made a device with several concentric rings, between which rollers were placed. This device with a diameter of 1m developed a potential equal to 1,000,000 volts, which was accompanied by crackling and the smell of ozone. The design of this generator is shown in Figure 6.

There are 10 rollers around the first (small) ring, 25 at the next ring and 35 around the outer ring. On the outer ring, above the ends of the rollers, electromagnetic converters of static potential into DC voltage are installed. Such a generator produces 15kW of power during stable operation. Studies of the Searl effect show that when the magnetic rollers are close to the magnetic ring, the resonant state of the magnetic field draws electrons and ions and, accelerating them in the gap between the rollers and the ring, creates a high static voltage with opposite charges on the stationary ring and the rollers rotating around it. High power at the output of such a generator is obtained by doping the magnetic material with neodymium, a rare earth metal that gives excess electrons. In 1999, SISRC Ltd, which includes subsidiaries in Germany, Sweden, Australia and New Zealand, announced the completion of an extensive program to modernize the Searl generator, which simplified the design. The company's specialists noted that discoveries in the field of vacuum state energy conversion play a key role in the effect of obtaining electrical energy using the Searl Generator /24/.

However, the main discovery was that when the specified potential difference and the maximum speed of the rollers in the dynamic equilibrium mode are reached, the device rises. An analysis of electromagnetic phenomena in the Searl device showed that the interaction of an electric field of high intensity, the vector of which, in a particular case, is directed along the radius to the pulsating magnetic field, creates its own gravitational field that compensates for the weight of the device itself. In addition, Searl generators can be used as high voltage sources in Brown disks.

Since 1952, Searle began manufacturing devices in the form of discs with a diameter of 10m. In the 1950s, publications about Searl's further work ceased. However, in 1970, an important feature of Searl's magnets became known: the characteristics of magnets can temporarily change when exposed to an external constant magnetic field. When the external field is removed, the characteristics of the magnets are restored. In addition, it became known that experiments were being carried out to replace ferrite with magnetic ceramics. Thus, in the early 1970s, as a result of numerous experiments and technical upgrades, it became obvious that Searl disks can be used as a source of electrical energy, the main unit of a gravitational engine for aircraft, or a combination of these technical areas.

Studies of the Searl effect conducted in Russia /25/ showed:

The mechanical energy of rotating permanent magnets is converted into electrical energy in accordance with the magnitude of the gravitational potential created by all masses in the local volume of space.

The movement of the magnetic rollers in the transducer's own electric field leads to the formation of a secondary gravitational field in accordance with the magnitude of the electric potential.

With an increase in the speed of rotation of the rotor (a system of magnetic rollers), the strength of the electric field increases and, as a result, the secondary gravitational field increases, which can reduce or cancel the weight of the structure.

If the energy of the electric field is not spent on electric discharges or heating the structure by induced currents, then a significant part of the mechanical energy manifests itself in the form of an antigravitational effect.

Spontaneous acceleration of the magnetic system is associated with the simultaneous presence of electric, magnetic and gravitational fields in the local region of space.

From the side of the magnetic field, the Lorentz force acts both on moving electric charges and on gravitationally charged bodies.

Since the structure itself is electrically neutral, the Lorentz force acts only on gravitationally charged rollers. The direction of the Lorentz force is perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field and the direction of movement of the magnetic rollers. If the cylindrical rollers rotated in one place, then the Lorentz force would be directed towards the axis of rotation and would not impart additional acceleration to them.

In addition to rotational, magnetic rollers also perform translational motion around the magnetic ring, so that each point on their surface moves along the cycloid, so the Lorentz force has two components: towards the center of the cylindrical roller and along the direction of their movement.

The magnitude of the Lorentz force depends on the electric potential, the strength of the magnetic field, the mass of the rollers and the speed of their movement.

The electric potential, in turn, depends on the speed of rotation of the roller system around the fixed ring. Thus, in the end, the Lorentz force depends on the speed according to a quadratic law.

Electrons accelerated by a toroidal electric field of high intensity ionize the gas in the surrounding space, causing it to glow /25/.

Currently, work is underway on the use of composite materials and multilayer magnetic structures in order to significantly increase the output power of Searl generators. It should be noted that the achieved level of high voltage obtained by using the Searl generator is sufficient to use it as a voltage source in Brown's flying disks.

Electrogravity and unified field theory.

Bayles, US Physical Institute, studying the interaction of UFOs with the environment, man-made and biological objects, came to the conclusion that Brown's theory can be significantly supplemented. Taking into account the results of the practical implementation of Brown's theory of electrogravity, Bayles proposed a theory of the interaction of strong electromagnetic and electric fields, as a result of which a controlled vector of gravitational force is created. Although this approach is not new, Bayles' theory is distinguished by its consideration of the problem from the point of view of unified field theory and quantum mechanics. His theory was presented by him to NASA at a conference in February 2003 /26/.

Without considering the mathematical apparatus for studying quantum interactions of fields and states of elementary particles, we will limit ourselves to the main provisions of the theory that explain the principle of UFO motion. These provisions are a consequence of the consideration of quantum and electrodynamic conditions, in which the entire structure of the UFO and its energy field are both a gravitational engine and a means of movement in space. A UFO surrounded by a microwave field is a single quantum potential similar to the energy potential of an electron. If there are conditions for an external energy action that creates a difference in energy levels, the electron can “tunnel” through the energy barrier to another point in space. This move is instantaneous. This feature of the electron's quantum state was discovered by David Bohm after he solved the Schrödinger wave equation for the quantum energy potential, which represents the electron's energy itself.

The physics associated with the quantum potential of David Bohm made it possible to expand the concept of quantum energy and the mechanics of gravity. One of the main provisions of the Bayles theory is the definition - the energy space is the source of Bohm's quantum potential. Bayles' Unified Field Theory allowed him to develop a new gravitational equation that expresses the mechanics of the vector magnetic potential. The equation shown in Figure 2 includes a vector magnetic potential and a new quantum coupling constant.

The assertion that a quantum particle such as an electron is essentially a standing wave formed the basis for considering the UFO motion system from the standpoint of wave theory, taking into account the design features and parameters of the UFO electromagnetic radiation obtained in direct measurements. Based on the fact that quantum and macroelectronic equations are similar, it becomes possible to move a macroquantum object by changing the phase or wave function of a quantum standing wave relative to a coupled electric standing wave in a strong electric field of the object.

Thus, a UFO, in a quantum sense, is similar to an electron, which gives it the ability to carry out instantaneous movements (jumps) in space, as an electron does when passing through an energy barrier by the “tunneling” method. The range of the UFO jump from its energy space to any point of the ordinary (surrounding) space is determined by the magnitude of the instantaneous phase transformation between the two indicated standing waves, which leads to a sharp, but manageable, change in the energy of the electromagnetic field. Speaking about the energy space of the UFO, one must keep in mind that the energy source can be the energy of vibrations of vacuum particles, converted into another, more convenient form of electrical energy. In a stationary position, the force field around the UFO-disk is symmetrical and has the shape of a torus. When creating a local asymmetry of the field, the UFO moves in the direction of its disturbance. Figure 7 shows a diagram of a UFO, which indicates the functional elements of the design.

Fig.7. Functional elements of the UFO design.

1. Compartment of the system of phase and group generation of standing waves.

2. Planar waveguides.

3. Residential and functional compartments.

4. Device for removal of corona discharge.

5. High dielectric ring.

6. Waveguide outputs.

The microwave radiation emerging from the waveguides -6 creates a force field that counteracts the external toroidal field, keeping it at some distance from the UFO body, thereby creating a vacuum region around the body. Group switching of energy along flat waveguides creates an adjustable asymmetry of the force field to change the spatial position of the UFO. Since the electric field strength in the upper part of the dome is maximum, there is a high probability of a corona discharge, which could lead to disturbances in the standing wave generation system. The corona discharge is removed using a device in the form of a “spike” of variable cross section located at the top of the dome.

Considering the real possibilities of copying UFO-type devices, Jerry Bayles suggested using a hydrogen atomic reactor as an energy source. In 1998, such a solution, from a technological point of view, could well be implemented.

Information beyond the threshold of secrecy.

In the United States, the B-2 aircraft became the first mass-produced aircraft using anti-gravity technology. A feature of the B-2 bomber is the large area of the horizontal surface of the aircraft in the form of a triangle. This feature provides maximum anti-gravity lift. At one time, Brown showed that although the shape of the disk is the most optimal, it is not necessary. Triangular, square or diamond-shaped devices fly with the same high efficiency. Further development of anti-gravity technology depends on advances in the development of newer dielectrics than the high-density RAM cermet. From sources close to Northrop Corporation, the manufacturer of anti-gravity devices, as well as from a publication in Aviation Week on March 9, 1992, it is known that a new dielectric is now available that can operate at a voltage of 15 million voltages. volt.

In 1993, Dr. La Violette prepared a report /27,28,29/ in which the B-2 bomber is discussed from the point of view of the use of an electrogravity system in it. It turns out that this plane uses an improved form of the anti-gravity principles first described by T. Brown. Confirmation of this thesis is available in the journal "Evolution Week and Space Technology" (March 1992), which reported that the B-2 bomber electrostatically charges the leading edge of the wing and the exhaust stream. The information was confirmed by Bob Ischsler, a NASA specialist. In flight, a positively charged region moves in front of the aircraft, while the ionized exhaust jet of jet engines creates a negatively charged region behind the aircraft. In this case, a certain modification of the Brown effect is realized, which has undeniable advantages in comparison with the conventional jet aircraft flight pattern.

B. Ischsler publicly made a similar statement in 1990. This information complements the information that there are major developments in the field of antigravity, which are used in military aviation. The appearance of the B-2 aircraft, US Air Force, is shown in Figure 8.

Fig.8. The appearance of the aircraft B-2.

From the conclusion of La Violetta's report: “The commercial airline industry can reap enormous benefits from this technology. It will not only significantly increase the fuel efficiency of jet airliners, significantly increase flight speed, but, most importantly, reduce flight time” /30/.

On May 9, 2001, the Public Organization “Project Disclosure” /31/ held a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington. She presented more than two dozen witnesses, including retired members of the Army, Navy and Air Force, a high official of the Federal Aviation Agency, employees of various intelligence organizations, including the CIA. All of them either witnessed events related to UFOs, or were aware of the nature of the activities of the government and industrial corporations in this area. They also produced a white paper /32/ for journalists and congressmen, as well as a book /33/ that collected dozens of testimonies from such people. Many of them talked about secret programs dealing with anti-gravity technologies, zero-point energy and the development of reproductions of alien vehicles (UFOs) as part of American "black projects".

Dan Morris /34/, worked in the Air Force, now retired. For many years he participated in "extraterrestrial projects". After leaving the Air Force, he was hired by the super-secret National Intelligence Organization (NRO), where he worked on UFO-related operations.

He had the highest level of security clearance.

“There are UFOs, both of alien origin and those made by humans. Townsend Brown was almost at the top along with the German scientists. So we had a problem. Our task was to protect Townsend Brown, to protect his work on the secrets of anti-gravity electromagnetic propulsion. Then, he describes a type of zero-point energy device.

“If you have one of these devices, about sixteen inches long, eight inches high, ten inches wide, you can no longer connect to the local power grid.” These devices do not burn anything. No pollution. They will never break because they have no moving parts. Only electrons move in the gravitational and electromagnetic fields. At the same time, they rotate in opposite directions.

"Dr. B." /35/ (name withheld as he is still working in the field) is a scientist-engineer who has worked on top-secret projects almost all his life. For many years he worked directly or was involved in secret projects related to anti-gravity, ultra-high energy space laser systems and electromagnetic pulse technologies.

“In fact, I took the opportunity to go to the Hughes in Malibu. They had very solid anti-gravity projects there. I am well acquainted with the details of these works. The flying disk has a small plutonium reactor inside, which, through conversion, produces huge electrical energy. We also have even more advanced propulsion technology, this is called a “virtual field”, which causes hydrodynamic waves…”

Capt. Bill Juhaus /36/ served 10 years in the Marine Corps as a pilot

fighter and four years in the Air Force civilian service at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base as a test pilot for an exotic experimental craft. Then, for the next 30 years, he worked for Department of Defense contractors as an engineer on anti-gravity propulsion systems: on exotic aircraft flight simulators and on real flying disks. “I think that the first flying disk simulator was put into operation no earlier than the beginning of the 60s. Possibly in 1962 or 1963

year. The reason I say this is because the simulator was not actually functional until around 1958. The simulator they used was for an alien craft they had, this 30 meter object crashed in Kingman, Arizona in 1953 or 1952.”

“We controlled it with six huge capacitors, each

they were charged with a million volts, so there were six million volts in those capacitors.”… various sizes of apparatuses of our construction”.

"A. X." /37/ works for Boeing Airspace, collected various information from secret groups working on projects related to UFOs and extraterrestrial civilizations in the government, the Ministry of Defense and civil companies. He has friends in the NSA, CIA, NASA, JPL, Naval Intelligence, NRA, Area 51, Air Force, Northrup, Boeing, and others.

“Most of the apparatus works on the principles of antigravity and electrogravity. We have now come to the final stage with respect to anti-gravity. I think another 15 years and we will have cars that will float above the ground using this type of technology. We're working on this right now at Area 51. It's one of the things my friend at Area 51 is working on with Northrup, who now lives in Pahrump, MA. Nevada. We're flying anti-gravity vehicles right now in Area 51 and Utah."

Colonel Williams /38/ joined the Air Force in 1964 and was a rescue helicopter pilot in Vietnam. He has a degree in electrical engineering and has led design projects for the Defense Air Command. During his military service, he knew about the existence of a top-secret facility at Norton Air Force Base in California.

“There was a structure at Norton Air Force Base that was closed from prying eyes. Even the command did not know what was happening there. Then there were rumors among the pilots that it was a secret repository for one device - a UFO.

Mark McCandlish /39/ is a professional aerospace illustrator who has worked for many of the leading aerospace corporations in the United States. His colleague was inside a building at Norton Air Force Base, where he saw reproductions of non-terrestrial vehicles that were fully functional and could fly. He argues that the US not only has working anti-gravity propulsion vehicles now. The United States has had them for many, many years. They were developed in the course of research, in particular, extraterrestrial vehicles in the last fifty years. Close friend Brad Sorensen told him about a large hangar he was in during an air show at Norton Air Force Base on November 12, 1988.

In this hangar, he saw flying saucers. “There were three flying saucers hovering above the floor. No wires connecting to the ceiling, no landing legs. They only hovered, hovering above the floor. He said that the smallest object was partly shaped like a bell. They were all identical in shape and proportions, only all three were of different sizes. Video footage was shown showing the smallest of the three craft standing on the ground in a desert area, presumably at the bottom of a dry lake, some sort of Area 51 type location.

This craft made three small, but quick, bouncing jerks, then flew straight up, quickly picking up speed, and within seconds completely disappeared from sight. There was no sound, no sonic boom, nothing.”

“This craft was what they called a ‘reproduction of an alien craft’ and was also given the nickname ‘Fluxliner’. This anti-gravity propulsion system - this flying saucer - was one of three that were in the hangar at Norton AFB. Its artificial vision system used the same type of technology used in the machine gun guidance system on the Apache helicopter: if the pilot wants to see what is behind him, he can turn on the view in that direction, and the cameras work in pairs. The pilot has a small screen in the front of the helmet, giving him an alternate look. He also puts on special goggles - in fact, you can actually buy a 3D vision system for your video camera right now and it will do the same - and when the pilot looks around, he sees a great 3D view of everything that is outside , and there are no windows. Why are there no windows? Most likely because the high voltages we are talking about are somewhere between half a million and a million volts.” Brad Sorensen said that at a demonstration of reproductions, "a three-star general said that these devices are capable of reaching the speed of light and even exceeding it."

Nick Cook's new book, Zero Point Hunt /40/ contains some of the strongest evidence for serious effort and success in antigravity technology. The author of the book has been an editor of Aviation magazine for the last 15 years and an aerospace engineering consultant for Janes Defense Weekly, and has spent the last 10 years gathering information for his book. It includes research into the archives of Nazi Germany on anti-gravity technologies, interviews with senior officials from NASA, the Pentagon and secret defense installations. He proves that America "cracked" the code of gravity and closed the information at the highest level of secrecy. The reason is that anti-gravity and related zero-point energy technologies offer the world the potential to have an inexhaustible and non-polluting source of energy in the future, so the information is withheld due to a “giant economic threat”. His findings corroborate the aforementioned eyewitness reports from Project Disclosure.

Brown communicated most of his findings about half a century ago, other experimenters have only recently begun to reproduce his work and report the results in the open literature and on the Internet. For example, Davenport /41/ published the results of his work in 1995, confirming the findings of T. Brown. Still later, the company "Transdimental Technologies" /42/ in the USA and the laboratories of J. Naudin /43/ in France published on the Internet diagrams, videos and experimental data of their versions of anti-gravity "elevators" based on the development of Brown's work. It is an obvious fact that big science still needs to demonstrate principles that were already demonstrated more than fifty years ago.

A whole series of demonstrations of "anti-gravitational" phenomena was carried out by scientists from many countries of the world. They include the work of Brazilian physics professor Fran de Aquino, as well as a demonstration of some devices: Searle's electrogravitational disk, Woodward's piezoelectric force field experiments.

All of them are described in more detail by Greer and Lowder /44/. An analysis of various theoretical approaches to the study of the antigravitational effect, which does not follow from Faraday's law and is not fully understood within the framework of Maxwell's theory of electrodynamics, leads to a simple, at first glance, postulate:

When the electric and magnetic fields interact, provided that the vectors of the interacting fields are perpendicular to each other, a third force vector arises, which manifests itself in the form of an antigravitational effect.

The use of various methods for obtaining active fields does not change the essence of the effect, and certain engineering solutions allow, with varying degrees of efficiency, to control the magnitude and direction of the gravitational force.

Consequences of antigravity research.

Research on antigravity and zero-point energy and their application has finally earned the attention of scientists of big science. This means that textbooks in this area will soon be rewritten and a new generation of students will be able to apply the “new knowledge”. Its application will lead to huge breakthroughs in transportation technologies in space and on the ground. As a result, we have the potential for human exploration of the solar system and beyond during our lifetime, if we are willing. It also implies that much of the technology of the 20th century will become useless, and in fact may already have.

Based on an analysis of trends in anti-gravity research over the past half century and information from numerous witnesses, it turns out that we have both good and bad news. /1/. Good news in the fact that we (within the framework of secret projects) have already developed the theory of antigravity, and, in addition, built a working spacecraft on its principles. The bad news is that these technologies have been developed for decades at public expense, and that humanity has been deprived of these technologies, continuing to waste energy using inefficient and dirty technologies.

In the early 90s, the largest research centers joined the antigravity projects, including:

Massachusetts Institute of Technology,

Science and Technology Base for Antigravity Research in Boston,

Institute Special Research at Princeton

Radiation Laboratory, Princeton University,

University of North Carolina,

Glen Martin Institute for Advanced Gravity Studies.

In the UK, an extensive research program is underway to develop a technology for obtaining special dielectrics for the implementation of electrogravity projects in aviation. Revolutionary successes in the theory of antigravity and its practical implementation do not mean the absence of problems in this area. There are still some problems with creating a more flexible spatial control system for powerful (50.000kVA) electric and electromagnetic fields. There are significant gaps in human protection from electromagnetic radiation. Advances in the technical solution of the problem of security are the main subject of competition and secrecy at the present time. Meanwhile, experts from leading aerospace firms, mastering new technologies within the framework of anti-gravity projects, believe that these problems are not as great as it seems at first glance /45/.

List of sources used:

/1/ Lowder at the 40th Aerospace Science Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reno, pc. Nevada, 2002. Translated from English. IN . Romanchenko.

/2/ Brown, T. T. 1929. How I control gravity. Science and Information Magazine, Aug. 1929. Reprinted in Psychic Observer

/3/ Oberth, Hermann: “Flying Saucers Come from a Distant World,” The American Weekly, October 24, 1954.

/4/ Frolov A.V. “Reactionless Propulsion and Active Force”, St.-Petersburg, 1998.

/5/ Aviation Studies (International) Ltd. 1956. Electro-gravitics Systems: An examination of electrostatic motion, dynamic counterbary and barycentric control. p. 14. In Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005.

/6/. Ibid, p. 27.

/7/. Ibid.p.19.

/8/ Gravity Rand Ltd. 1956. The Gravitics Situation. p. 54. In Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005.

/9/ Aviation Studies (International) Ltd. 1956. Electrogravitics Systems: An examination of electrostatic motion, dynamic counterbary and barycentric control. p. 11. In Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005.

/10/ Ibid., p. 34.

/11/ Ibid., p. 41.

/12/ Gravity Rand Ltd. 1956. The Gravitics Situation. p. 47. In Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005.

/13/ Aviation Studies (International) Ltd. 1956. Electrogravitics Systems: An examination of electrostatic motion, dynamic counterbary and barycentric control. p. 32. In Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005.

/14/ Evans, M. W. 2002. The link between the Sachs and O(3) theories of electrodynamics. In Evans, M. W. (ed.), Modern Nonlinear Physics.

/15/ Anastasovski, P. K., T. E. Bearden, C. Ciubotariu, W. T. Coffey, L. B. Crowell, G. J. Evans, M. W. Evans, R. Flower, A. Labounsky, B. Lehnert, M. M And sz A ros, P. R. Moln A r, S. Roy, and J.-P. Vigier. (In Press). Anti gravity effects in the Sachs theory of electrodynamics Foundations of Physics Letters.

/16/ Alcubierre, M. 1994. The Warp Drive: Hyper-fast travel within general relativity. Classical and Quantum Gravity.

/17/ Fran De Aguino: Gravitation and Electromagnetism; Correlation and Grand Unification, S. Luis, Brazil, 1999.

/18/ Puthoff, H. E. 1996. SETI, The Velocity-of-Light Limitation, and the Alcubierre Warp Drive: An Integrating Overview, Physics Essays.

/19/ Puthoff, H. 1989. “Gravity as a Zero-Point Fluctuation Force.” Phys. Rev A., 39(5):. Puthoff, H. 1989. “Source of Electromagnetic Zero-Point Energy.” Phys. Rev A, 40(9):.

/20/ Anastasovski, P. K., T. E. Bearden, C. Ciubotariu, W. T. Coffey, L. B. Crowell, G. J. Evans, M. W. Evans, R. Flower, A. Labounsky, B. Lehnert, M. M And sz A ros, P. R. Moln A r, J. K. Moscicki, S. Roy, and J. P. Vigier. 2001. Explanation of the motionless elect romagnetic generator with 0(3) Electrodynamics. Foundations of Physics Letters, 14(1):87-93

/21/ See the Tom Bearden web site for an extensive listing and copies of his papers at: www. cheniere. org.

/22/ Bearden, T. 2002. Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts and Principles. World Scientific (In Press).

/24/Consortium searl international, www. /e. htm

/25/ “Searle magnetogravity converter”, Sci Tec , 2002.

/26/ J. E. Bayles, Electrogravitation as a unified field theory, http://www. /gravbook/ (APPENDIX).

/27.28/ LaViolette, P. 1993. The U.S. Antigravity Squadron. In Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005.

/29/ LaViolette, P. A. 1992. Electrogravitics: Back to the future. LaViolette, P. A. 1993. A theory of electrogravitics. Electric Spacecraft, Issue 8.

/30/ LaViolette, P. A. 2000. Moving Beyond the First Law and Advanced Field Propulsion Technologies. in T. Loder (ed.). “Outside-the-Box” Technologies, Their Critical Role Concerning Environmental Trends, and the Unnecessary Energy Crisis. Report prepared for The U.S.

/31/ Information available at: www. disclosure project. org.

/32/ Greer, S. M. and T. C. Loder III. 2001. Disclosure Project Briefing Document, 492 pp. Available on CD from: The Disclosure Project, P. O. Box 2365, Charlottesville, VA 22902.

/33/ Greer, S. M. 2001. Disclosure: Military and government witnesses reveal the greatest secrets in modern history. Crossing Point Inc. Crozet, VA.

/34/ Ibid., pp. 357-366.

/35/ Ibid., pp. 262-270.

/36/ Ibid., pp. 384-387.

/37/ Ibid., pp. 391-403.

/38/ Ibid., pp. 388-389.

/39/ Ibid., pp. 497-510.

/40/ Cook, N. 2001. The Hunt for Zero Point.

/41/ Deavenport, L. 1995. “T. T. Brown Experiment replicated. Electric Spacecraft Journal. Issue 16 Oct. 1995. (Reprinted in: Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electro-gravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005)